Tag Archives: equity

Dilemmas of Founders

HartebeestsIf you are considering starting a company, or if you have recently started a company, an essential item for your reading list is Noam Wasserman’s The Founder’s Dilemmas. Based on years of solid research and experience, this book surveys many of the biggest problems facing founders of high growth start-ups. I want to share with you some of the thorniest of those problems here. But please don’t take my word for it. Buy the book for the complete story [No, I don’t get a commission].

1. Career Dilemma

You are currently employed and earn a comfortable salary. You have a great idea for a new start-up. How do you determine what to do?

If you stay with your current job, you maintain the security of a paycheck but likely give up the dream of starting a company, spreading your wings, and perhaps “getting rich.” Most investors will not invest in a startup without the founders/officers demonstrating a significant level of commitment, and that means “quitting your day job.”

If you quit your day job, you have the chance to make it big, but you give up the security of a paycheck. Can you afford to do that? Most start-ups cannot afford to pay the founders a salary for the first few years, so you need to have a significant enough nest egg put away to afford a few years of financial drought.

2. Co-Founders with Complementary Skills

Often entrepreneurs co-found companies with others who have very similar backgrounds as themselves. The advantage of this is you all speak the same language. The problem is that starting a company requires a diverse set of skills: technology, marketing, sales, financial, legal, and so on.

The best teams tend to ones that combine diverse skills and diverse personalities.

3. Title for the Founder

Many individual founders believe that they should lead their companies with a title such as CEO. Derived from Wasserman, the figure on the right shows the starting role that the “idea person” serves in start-ups. Although the initial idea person may be the perfect CEO for the start-up due to commitment and passion, the skills required for leading the company through long-term growth may not be present. Only 75% of founder-CEOs are still in the CEO position by the time of the first external investment round, and only 39% are still in that role by the time of the fourth round.

4. Who is in Charge?

Most start-ups have a single individual who serves as leader; s/he could have any
of a variety of titles; chief executive officer, president, and chief operating officer are typical. This individual reports to the board of directors. If you are considering having nobody in charge, or having two or more co-presidents in charge, think again. Tough times will come. And when those tough times arrive, somebody needs to make the tough decisions. The movie, Startup.com, exposes many start-up problems, not the least of which is what happens to relationships when one of two co-founders thinks they are “co-CEOs.”

5. Liquidation Multiples

When investors purchase preferred stock, they typical ask for (and receive) a liquidation preference, which specifies what multiple of their purchase price they will receive upon a liquidity event prior to general distribution of the remaining funds to all shareholders. I described some of the problems related to liquidation preferences in an earlier blog called Liquidation Preference and Avoiding Dilution.

According to Wasserman, Series A investors in 78% of all start-ups that raised external investments had a liquidation multiple of 1; 9% had a liquidation multiple of 1.1 to 2; 5% had a liquidation multiple of 2.1 to 3; and 8% had a liquidation multiple of greater than 3.

The dilemma is: Do you accept an investment whose terms include high liquidation preferences even though it in effect makes earlier investors’ return nil [and significantly dilutes the founders], or do you turn down the investment hoping for better terms from another investor?

If you accept the terms, you have thrown your earlier investors under the bus. If you refuse the terms, you may be throwing the entire company under the bus. Therein lays the dilemma.

6. External vs. Internal Boards

If you have a board of directors composed of the inner circle, e.g., co-founders and/or fellow officers, you can make decisions with your co-leaders and know they will be endorsed by the board. But now you have no “sounding board.” You have no independent thinkers. You have no checks and balances. The primary reason for a board should be to hear other opinions.

7. Control vs. Wealth

In an earlier blog called You Are Not Your Company, I described the problem founders have of trying to control their companies vs. distributing ownership and creating a much bigger pie to share among more mouths.

8. Compensation

Should officers of the company (and in fact all employees) receive cash compensation equal to what they would receive at a non-start-up company? Should they receive stock options as an incentive to join the company? Should they receive stock options in lieu of cash compensation? What is the right balance among these three?

There is no right answer. However, the decision is affected significantly by the amount of cash the company has (and this is affected by the desire to attract investors and/or the desire to time investments based on company valuation) and the amount of control that the founders demand or are comfortable with sharing.

9. How Long Should Vesting Be

When options are granted or stocks are sold to employees with reverse vesting, how long should the vesting period be?

On one hand, a long vesting period sounds like an incentive for the individual to stay with the company for that long period of time.

On the other hand, a long period of vesting could also cause a frustrated individual to say “I can’t wait that long; I might as well leave now.” The table on the right, from Wasserman, shows how long the vesting period is in start-up companies for founder CEOs vs. non-founder CEOs.

In summary

Starting a company is not for the faint of heart. Fortunately books like Wasserman’s Founder’s Dilemmas exist to guide you through the tough times.


Dr. Al Davis has published 100+ articles in journals, conferences and trade press, and lectured 2,000+ times in 28 countries. He is the author of 6 books, including the latest, Will Your New Start Up Make Money? He is co-founder and CEO of Offtoa, Inc., an internet company that assists entrepreneurs in crafting their business strategies to optimize financial return for themselves and their investors. Formerly, he was founding member of the board of directors of Requisite, Inc., acquired by Rational Software Corporation in 1997, and subsequently acquired by IBM in 2003; co-founder, chairman and CEO of Omni-Vista, Inc.; and vice president at BTG, Inc., a Virginia-based company that went public in 1995, acquired by Titan in 2001, and subsequently acquired by L-3 Communications in 2003.

If you’d like to learn if your great business idea will make money, take a look at Will Your New Start Up Make Money?

Photo of fighting male hartebeests by Filip Lachowski (Creative Commons)

Personnel Strategies for Startups

The best talent will usually command the highest compensation. If you are not prepared to reward employees with an equity stake in the company, you need to be prepared to compensate them well. Although the best human resources want high salaries, the opposite is not always true: high salary demands do not necessarily mean the best human resources. Here are some personnel strategies for reducing salary expense:

  • Young talent. Sometimes you can find young, relatively inexperienced talent who can do a fantastic job for the company. It is a win-win: they gain experience, you make use of their talent and it doesn’t cost you much. Just make sure you plan to eventually reward the ones that work out well . . . or you will lose them.
  • Performance-based compensation. Another way to reduce your payroll expenses and to reward your employees is to tie their compensation to performance. This works especially well with sales personnel with commis­sions (tied to sales) and executives with bonuses (tied to revenue targets, profit targets, etc.), but can also work for other personnel for meeting milestones and other performance-based metrics. I prefer for a large percent of such compensation to be tied to company-based performance rather than individual-based performance; this motivates teamwork rather than self-interest.
  • Equity. A strategy I have used in many start-ups is to offer emplo­yees a fairly large ownership position in lieu of high (or even market-competitive) salaries. This way the company can attract the absolutely best talent, employees remain highly motiva­ted because of the potential upside if the company does well, but the company does not become cash-strapped trying to meet payroll. The question becomes how much of the company is a “fairly large ownership position?” As a general rule, I like to plan up front to allocate a third of the company’s equity for employees, but no hard and fast rules exist; the more loyal and dedicated you want your employees to be, the larger the equity stake should be.

The above extracted from my latest book, Will Your New Start Up Make Money? Buy your copy in Kindle or paperback formats at http://www.amazon.com/Will-Your-Start-Make-Money-ebook/dp/B00JOOZQNE.